Oliver & Company is a very solid film. Nothing in it is
exactly spectacular but none of it painful in any way. Disney basically took
Oliver Twist and morphed it into a story with cats and dogs set in the 1980s.
Of course they take their own liberties such as adding an extremely racist
Mexian chihuahua played by Cheech Marin. While that may seem awful on paper,
its execution is pretty good. In fact the execution of everything is okay. It's
all really solid overall. Oliver is just the right amount of cute, the side
characters have very solid entertainment value, the music is enjoyable and the
central conflict is engaging enough to keep your interest.
Oliver is the only
cat with a name in the movie and is our protagonist. Just like the rest of the
movie he does exactly what he needs to. He's cute, his actions influence the
story, and he isn't voiced by an obnoxious child actor with a lisp. Caturday is
all about cat media, but Oliver & Company is mostly dogs. The film follows
Oliver as he is alone in the streets, adopted by a group of dogs with their
homeless owner. He is then adopted by a little rich girl. After the dogs rescue
him, he wants to go back to the girl. The homeless Jew, meanwhile, owes Mr.
Sykes some money and concocts a plan to get the rich girl's money (who he
thinks is a rich man) by trading Oliver for ransom money. When he finds out it
is a little girl, he does not take her money and Mr. Sykes tries to kill him in
a ridiculous chase scene where he follows them onto subway rails.
There
isn’t a lot to the plot and that’s because the movie is fairly short, only
about 100 minutes. It actually works it its advantage though. The pacing is
very strong, making sure there is never a dull moment. It also doesn’t overstay
its welcome. The only love story is a comedic love story between Tito, the
Mexican Chihuahua, and Georgette, the snotty poodle. The story and its surrounding
jokes take up just a few minutes overall, and it’s all handled well so that it
doesn’t bog down the movie. There are no long scenes which deliver unneeded
exposition on the supporting cast. We don’t even know much about Mr. Sykes.
Speaking
of Mr. Sykes, why does a homeless man owe him money in the first place? Why
would a mob boss give a homeless man money or anything else in the first place?
My theory is that Mr. Sykes was not as powerful as the movie makes you believe.
Mr. Sykes runs his operation on an isolated section at the docks. His only henchmen
are two Dobermans. That seems like a pretty small operation. Really, Mr. Sykes
is nothing more than a small business owner, who is in an unloving relationship
with his wife and kids and decided to spice up his life by playing mob boss
with a homeless man. He bought a couple of trained dogs, a cheap piece of land
at the docks, found a homeless man, and let the games begin. He let it go out
of control until it led to his death in a ridiculous chase scene.
Of
course none of that is true, but I like to believe it is. It explains some of
the narrative gaps. While there are gaps, they aren’t plot holes. They could be
easily explained with a couple of sentences yet the movie decides that those
details aren’t important. It sets out to tell a solid self-contained story and
does a very fine job with that. There’s nothing bad, nothing amazing, it’s just
a very solid children’s film.
Final Purrdict: Pawsitive